A friend (X) had his camera stolen in unusual circumstances on September's London Critical Mass.

In his own words:

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

"[my camera was] wrestled off me by two 'rude-boys' after I took their picture for bumping a girl who was holding them back [from driving into the mass] whilst the crowd moved on (I put up a good fight to hold on to the camera/evidence but they got the camera in the end). Cops waded in, one of the guys ran off into the crowd but we held the other from driving off by holding his doors open. A cop pushed his way into the driver's seat, pushed the driver into the pasenger seat, grabbed the keys off him, and drove off at high speed, with my camera in the car !

Spent an hour at Charing Cross police station repeatedly explaining the story, before getting nothing more than a crime number."

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

I don't think it fantastical or in the realms of internet conspiracy theories to hypothesise the following:

The police are in the middle of an attempt to have CM closed down or otherwise limited/curtailed.

In the run up to the Law Lord's decision on the legality of the event (as it currently describes itself), the police decide that September's ride will be un-policed in the hope that without their presence there may be a decent chance of friction (or better still conflict/violence) between the cyclists and other road users - which would give their case against CM additional impetus in both the media and in the courts.

So what better way to force the issue than to send a couple of off duty boys (or perhaps a couple of local known 'rude boys') down to drive around in an attempt to push and poke the cyclists into a reaction.

A witness ('Cookie') allegedly overheard one of the policemen say "drive straight through 'em" to the driver, although this is at best ambiguous in meaning.

The problem is someone (my friend (X)) gets a direct snap shot of the 'rude boys' - so these 'rude boys' need to recover the camera - which they do - but then everyone stop's them from driving off by blocking their car's escape route, then the on duty police have little choice but to simply get in the car and take the whole sorry mess out of there.

It seems very odd that a policeman should leave the scene of at least one unambiguous crime (the theft of my friend's camera) - and attempt to drive a suspect's vehicle away from a crime scene with the suspect sat next to him un-handcuffed ?

The fact that when my friend attempted to follow this up and they couldn't find any record of the incident only adds to the strange circumstance.

Of course this is all hypothetical - but I would be interested to see if the police reinstate their policing of this months event ?